Jul 13, 2024 20:00:00

We ran various benchmarks on HP's Copilot+ PC 'OmniBook X 14 AI PC' equipped with Snapdragon X Elite

The 'OmniBook X AI PC' from HP is

a Copilot+ PC suitable for running AI workloads locally, and is equipped with Qualcomm's PC SoC ' Snapdragon X Elite '. We ran various benchmarks on the 14-inch model ' OmniBook X 14 AI PC ' to see how well HP's Copilot+ PC performs.

HP OmniBook X AI PC | HP Japan
https://www.hp.com/jp-ja/laptops-and-2-in-1s/omnibook-x-ai-pc.html

The appearance, size, and keyboard layout features of the 'OmniBook X 14 AI PC' are explained in the following article.

Photo review of HP's 14-inch Copilot+ PC 'OmniBook X 14 AI PC' suitable for running AI models locally - GIGAZINE

The Snapdragon X Elite is an Arm-based PC SoC that implements 12 Qualcomm Oryon CPU cores with a maximum speed of 3.8 GHz, the Qualcomm Adreno GPU with a maximum speed of 4.6 TFLOPs, and the Qualcomm Hexagon NPU with a computing power of 4.45 TOPs. Microsoft's Copilot+ PC has three minimum requirements: an embedded processor or SoC with an NPU of 40 TOPS or more, 16GB DDR5/LPDDR5 RAM, and a storage device of 256GB SSD/UFS or more. At the time of writing, only the Snapdragon X series meets the requirement of 40 TOPS or more, and the OmniBook X 14 AI PC is also equipped with the Snapdragon X Elite.

◆Specifications
First, I used CPU-Z to check the CPU information. The CPU is a Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite with 12 cores and 12 threads. The GPU is a Qualcomm Adreno GPU X1E.

In addition, the free app '

GPU-Z ', which allows you to check the GPU model name and memory capacity, was not available on the OmniBook X14 AI PC.

Next, we checked the storage information with '

CrystalDiskInfo '. The installed storage is a 1TB SSD ' KBG50ZNV1T02 ' made by KIOXIA.

When I looked at the NPU in the task manager, it said 'Qualcomm Hexagon NPU'. The memory installed is 16GB.

◆Benchmark
Next, we will measure the storage read/write speed with various benchmark software. First, we measured the storage read/write speed with '

CrystalDiskMark ', and the sequential read was '3397.82MB/s', the sequential write was '2957.18MB/s', the random read was '323.15MB/s', and the random write was '479.55MB/s'. In addition, the ' 7th Generation Surface Laptop ', a Copilot+ PC equipped with Snapdragon X Elite from Microsoft, had a sequential read of '3659.83MB/s', a sequential write of '2937.89MB/s', a random read of '374.96MB/s', and a random write of '463.13MB/s'.

We used

CrystalMark Retro to measure the CPU's single-core performance, multi-core performance, storage read/write performance, etc. The results were an overall score of 3903, a CPU single-core score of 7529, a multi-core score of 80642, a sequential read of 25311, and a sequential write of 22965.

We also performed measurements using the standard benchmark app '

Geekbench 6. ' First, the CPU benchmark results were a single-core score of '2332' and a multi-core score of '12993.'

The single-core score details look like this.

The multi-core score details are as follows:

Next, the GPU benchmark results. The OpenCL score was 20069.

The OpenCL score breakdown looks like this:

Vulkan score is '22974'.

Here's the breakdown of Vulkan's scores:

Next, we tested it with

Passmark PerformanceTest V11 , which performs benchmark measurements on five items: CPU, 2D, 3D, memory, and disk, and calculates an overall score. There is an ARM version as well as an x86 version, but since there are few usage cases of the ARM version and it is difficult to compare the benchmark results with other users, we will run both the x86 and ARM versions this time.

First, the results for the x86 version. The overall score was 3742, with a percentile of 42%.

We pulled out the logs of benchmark results that had been run in the past by the GIGAZINE editorial department and compared the scores of the 'Surface Laptop 5' and 'Dell XPS 13/14', as well as the '

ASUS Vivobook S 15 ' and '7th Generation Surface Laptop', which are also Copilot+ PCs.

The CPU score is '14091' with a percentile of 53%.

Here's a comparison with the scores of the 'Surface Laptop 5', 'Dell XPS 13/14', 'ASUS Vivobook S 15', and '7th Generation Surface Laptop'.

The 2D graphics score was 356, which is in the 30th percentile.

A graph comparing the scores of the 'Surface Laptop 5,' 'Dell XPS 13/14,' 'ASUS Vivobook S 15,' and '7th Generation Surface Laptop.'

The 3D graphics score was 2690, which puts it in the 31% percentile.

A graph comparing the scores of the 'Surface Laptop 5,' 'Dell XPS 13/14,' 'ASUS Vivobook S 15,' and '7th Generation Surface Laptop.'

Memory score was '2381' with a percentile of 34%.

Here's a comparison with the scores of the 'Surface Laptop 5', 'Dell XPS 13/14', 'ASUS Vivobook S 15', and '7th Generation Surface Laptop'.

The disk score was 26255, with a percentile of 83%.

Below is a graph comparing the scores of the 'Surface Laptop 5', 'Dell XPS 13/14', 'ASUS Vivobook S 15', and '7th Generation Surface Laptop'.

Next, we tested the ARM version. The overall score was 3674, which puts it in the 40th percentile of the overall benchmark results using the software.

Below is a graph comparing the scores of the 'ASUS Vivobook S 15' and '7th Generation Surface Laptop', which are also Copilot+ PCs equipped with Snapdragon X Elite.

The CPU score is '23814' and the percentile is 77%, which is quite high.

Here is a graph comparing the scores of the 'ASUS Vivobook S 15' and the '7th Generation Surface Laptop'.

The 2D graphics score was 375, which is in the 31% percentile.

A graph comparing the scores of the 'ASUS Vivobook S 15' and the '7th Generation Surface Laptop.'

The 3D graphics score was 2170, which is in the 25th percentile.

A graph comparing the scores of the 'ASUS Vivobook S 15' and the '7th Generation Surface Laptop.'

The memory score was 3334, with a percentile of 79%, both of which were high.

Below is a graph comparing the scores of the 'ASUS Vivobook S 15' and the '7th Generation Surface Laptop'.

The disk score was '26364', which is a percentile of 80%.

Below is a graph comparing the scores of the 'ASUS Vivobook S 15' and the '7th Generation Surface Laptop'.

Finally, I tried using the '

FINAL FANTASY XV WINDOWS EDITION Benchmark ' provided by Square Enix. Please note that this benchmark is compatible with Windows 7/8.1/10, but not Windows 11. The results of running the benchmark with maximum load 'Image quality: High quality', 'Resolution: 3840 x 2160', and 'Window: Full screen' are as follows. The score was '764' and the evaluation was 'Difficult to operate'.

When I tried running the game again at a resolution of 1920 x 1080, the score was 1451 and the rating was 'Difficult to run.' Although it was a slight improvement, it was still hard to call it a comfortable game.

We will continue to measure battery life, heat, noise, etc.

Continued
We checked the battery life, heat generation, and AI functions of HP's Copilot+ PC 'OmniBook X 14 AI PC' - GIGAZINE