In a lawsuit over ``Is Subway's tuna real tuna?'' it is reported that ``DNA from chicken, pig, and cow was found in Subway's tuna.''

When Subway was sued over the claim that ``the tuna used in its tuna sandwiches does not contain tuna,'' the plaintiff said, ``The tuna used by Subway is not 100% tuna, but is made from chicken, pork, or beef.'' We submitted the findings to the court showing that the DNA contained in the DNA of

Lawsuit over Subway tuna now says chicken, pork, cattle DNA were detected | Reuters
https://www.reuters.com/business/retail-consumer/new-lawsuit-over-subway-tuna-says-chicken-pork-cattle-dna-were-detected-2021-11-11/

Subway tuna contains chicken, pork and cattle: lawsuit
https://nypost.com/2021/11/11/subway-tuna-contains-chicken-pork-and-cattle-lawsuit/

The incident began when Karen Danowa and Nileema Amin filed a lawsuit against Subway, claiming that ``Subway's tuna is a mixture of foods other than tuna.'' Mr. Danois and Mr. Amin claimed, ``As a result of sending samples to a laboratory for analysis, we found that Subway's tuna does not even contain fish.''

Subway is sued for 'no tuna in tuna' - GIGAZINE

by yoppy

However, Subway does not acknowledge the points made by the two plaintiffs, and instead has set up a special website that emphasizes that ``Subway's tuna is real tuna.'' This site summarized the tuna manufacturing process and trivia provided by Subway.

Subway opens a special website that promotes ``Our tuna is real tuna'' - GIGAZINE

Plaintiffs Danowa and Amin collected tuna samples from 20 Subway stores in Southern California and brought them to the Barber Lab in the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at the University of California, Los Angeles , for testing.

The plaintiffs reported that 19 of the 20 samples contained no detectable tuna DNA sequences. In addition, all 20 samples contained ``sequences detectable in chicken DNA'', 11 samples contained pig DNA, and 7 samples contained cow DNA.

The plaintiffs claim that Subway misrepresents tuna that contains DNA from other animals. The investigation found that Subway not only mislabeled ``100% tuna'' but also committed ``potential ethical violations'' such as deceiving people who restrict their food intake due to eating style or religion. He states that he is committing a crime.

A Subway spokesperson criticized the contents of the third amendment, saying, ``Subway's tuna is high quality and 100% tuna.'' ``Plaintiffs change their opinion every time they file a complaint.This is the third amendment.'' The complaint was filed after the complaint was properly dismissed by a federal judge.'

In June 2021, the New York Times independently investigated and reported that ``the sample did not contain tuna DNA.''

Survey results show that ``tuna DNA'' could not be detected in Subway tuna, pointing out that it is pointless to disguise tuna as cheap from the beginning - GIGAZINE

by Mike Mozart

However, in July 2021, the news site Inside Edition reported that when three tuna sandwiches were sent to a laboratory for testing, all of the sandwiches contained tuna.