It is pointed out that people claiming to have 'undergone acoustic attack' by ultrasound may have 'group hysteria'
By Anders Sandberg
In the case of an acoustic attack which is said to have occurred intermittently from December 2016 at the American embassy in Cuba, it is necessary to irradiate "ultrasound" which is invisible to the American embassy in the embassy and staff It is said to have caused symptoms such as insomnia and hearing abnormality, brain damage injury brain. Since then, reports from US government officials in China working in China from 2017 to 2018 have also raised reports of similar symptoms, and "acoustic attacks" are drawing attention in the near future. However, from many psychiatric experts, it is stated that these symptoms are like "delusions" of the victim and that the group of victims was in a state of collective hysteria .
Those 'Sonic Attack' Victims Are Actively Experiencing Mass Hysteria, Expert Claims
https://www.sciencealert.com/sonic-attack-victims-actually-experiencing-mass-hysteria-expert-claims-psychogenic-illness-delusions-robert-bartholomew
Surveys are being conducted over a series of "sound attacks", but the truth has not been clearly revealed. "While invisible attacks were made using modulated microwave" Microwave Auditory Effect ", Cuban Foreign Minister said," No evidence of acoustic attacks has been found "and the United Nations There is a situation in which a definitive answer has not been found, such as addressing at the general meeting .
What was going on at the American Embassy in Cuba where "sound attack" was reported? - GIGAZINE
Meanwhile, Robert Bartholomew's medical sociologist, "this incident that we are paying attention is sure to be due to mass hysteria and collective implied" and against ABC News says I will . Mr. Bartholomew is an expert on collective psychology, psychogenic diseases within the group and describes the findings of the phenomenon of symptoms such as hysteria occurring in the group without biological basis.
Robert Bartholomew - The Sociologist
http://robertebartholomew.com/
Regarding the acoustic attack incident that is said to have occurred at the Cuban embassy, the research team at the University of Pennsylvania said that "the victim has been damaged over a wide range of networks in the brain regardless of past head injuries" It is announced in February 2018. However, Mr. Bartholomew denies the content, argues that the symptoms presented are psychological.
Mr. Bartholomew for ABC News said, "Acoustic weapons can not cause a cerebral neurosis or affect the white matter of the brain, which is physically impossible," said the American Medical Association We dispute the findings published in the journal "Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA)".
Mr. Bersolomu, who reviewed the content posted on JAMA, said, "Looking at the actual data on" symptoms like cerebral symp- toms "shown in the thesis, the brain's structure was affected There is room to allow various interpretations in the scanned data, "these data are obtained by scanning," the opinion that the conclusion of the thesis is not conclusive I am talking.
By Mariano Cuajao
Mr. Bersolomu believes that the results of various surveys and the response the government has taken have "no basis", he seems to believe that there is even an aspect of overreaction. "When I summarize this incident easily," When I hear the sound of the hooves in the dark night, I think the first thing is "a horse came", I do not think that "a zebra came" But the ambassador The officials thought that "the unicorns came." They said that they made the hypothesis that it should be the most eccentric and scientifically impossible, "and there is a scientific It is pointed out that there was no basis.
Mitchell Joseph Valde Sosa of the Cuban Neuroscience Center of Cuban Neuroscience Center said, "When I first say" There was an attack ", I can not draw it again." " Does anyone who wants to admit themselves as being wrong? They are driven to the corner of the ring themselves and they do not know how to escape. "
Mr. Bartholomew is a method of "acoustic attack" showing a negative view, but on the other hand it is still awaiting explanation as to the true appearance of various symptoms that many practitioners actually experienced and their causes Where it is. The view of Mr. Bersolomu et al. Is the idea of "acoustic attack denial faction" to the last, it can not be said to decide the truth of this case. However, showing the grounds to support that "there was no acoustic attack" is similar to " proof of devil ", and elucidation of the truth will become extremely difficult until evidence of definitive attack is found It certainly shows a different aspect.
Related Posts: