What is the most meaningless battle in history?

Although human history and "war" can not be separated from each other, there are some wars that change history, some warfare can not be understood even after looking backwards. Live Science considers what is the most meaningless battle in history in European history.

What Was the Most Pointless Battle in History?
https://www.livescience.com/62009-what-was-most-pointless-battle.html

When thinking about the most meaningless battle in history, it was decided in 1942 that it happened in Dieppe, France "Battle of Dieppe"Will be an excellent candidate. In the Battle of Dieppe, the coalesces of Canada, the United States and the United Kingdom have suffered catastrophic damage because the secret of execution of the strategy was leaked to the German army before the war because the winnings were thin due to insufficient strength and operation .

Also, it happened between France and Mexico in 1838 "Confectionery war"Even the French king who truly received the petition of a confectionery craftsman who appealed the shop to the Mexican army appealed reparations to Mexico as a result of Mexico's declaration of war and the war had begun, which is worthless It is listed as one of the battles.


However, Live Science cited "the fight between Austria and Ottoman Turkey", which was supposed to have occurred from September 21 to 22, 1788, as the most promising candidate for "battle most meaningful in history" by suppressing these fights It is. The unnamed fight is a virtual suicide bomb victim without an opponent by the Austrian army, and it is a silo mono that can not be said to be a nearly war.

On the evening of September 21, 1788, under the direction of Emperor Joseph II of the Roman Empire, the Austrian army was marching at night to catch the Turkish army. One military group stopped marching in the current city of Romania called Calancevez to take a rest and the cavalry officers said they began drinking after buying alcohol. When a drunk soldier criticized the Austrian army who got into a panic by being attacked by the Turkish army and told a joke that the rear soldier who could not grasp the situation because of the dark misunderstood that he was murdered by the Turkish army Thing. When fire was fired behind, the soldiers panicked and it seems that the gun battle began in the dark.


Dawn overnight, it turned out that there were no Turkish soldiers in the ocean of blood where nearly 10,000 Austrian soldiers were killed or injured. When the Austrian army was attacked by the Turkish army two days later, Carrancevez fell in a brief fall and came to the hands of the Turkish army. As mentioned above, the place that allowed the enemy to be attacked by ejaculation by suicide bombardment is valued as the most meaningless battle.

However, in recent years the question of the Austrian army has been raised about the record that "10,000 casualties were issued". Mr. Matthew Mayer of McGill University in Canadathe studyIt is clear that Joseph II had sent a letter to his brother Leopardo on the incident that occurred on the evening of September 21, 1788, among which "I finally regained calmness, but the Turkish army It was fortunate that we were not in front of us, the entire army had been destroyed otherwise, but it was discovered that the figure that the military's damage was 10,000 people came out It is said that it does not come. Even in the records of other histories it seems that we can not confirm the number "10,000 people".

People remember that Austrians issued 10,000 victims through a squad of darkness means that in the biography "Joseph II" written by historian Paul Bernard published in 1968, "10 thousand people Although it is because there is a number 'Bernard' has omitted the grounds for numbers, there is a doubt about the authenticity. Of course, even if it is "the most stupid in history", there are many things to learn from that history. Mayer said, "The accuracy of the record that marked this battle needs to be refocused."