Oricon responded to individuals for damages of 50 million yen as compensation
That Oricon famous for the Oricon chart seems to request damages for individuals as much as 50 million yen. The reason is libel.
Why is 50 million yen, Oricon's sales are 5.7 billion yen, it seems to have calculated that it is less than 1% of it. Furthermore, in order to have a lawyer take charge of a trial, it is necessary to start with money, and since this settlement amount will be over 2 million yen, in this way it will automatically be defeated before fighting and even a large amount of debt It seems that there is probably a waiting future for the shoulder and lost in the street heading ... ....
The summary of why this has been the case is as follows.
First thing is the beginning. I will not start until I read this for the time being. It is too overdoing to have an intention to litigate on the Oricon side.
"Oricon" filed a suit for damages of 50 million yen against Wuyangyang individual
On the other hand, the Oricon side also explained on the net. Perhaps it seems that you are short of explanation probably by anticipating a trial.
About defamation of our company based on fact misidentification CONFIDENCE ranking & news - ORICON STYLE-
And the article that Oricon appealed is below. The content of the article itself is not very new.
This is the article of "Saisei" Oricon appealed Wraiyang
Let's examine whether Oricon's assertion is correct or not. The following is the basis of the research content that Oricon has revealed. The trusted level changes depending on how the contents written below are taken as the reference value of trust.
About Oricon's music software (single, album) chart - ORICON STYLE ranking
Did the Oricon side take any means to prove his legitimacy before appealing? And question marks come out ... .... At least for the grounds of the chart, it is only a matter of making a system that gives something of a level that can withstand statistical verification in a bit more detail, or reconsidering secrecy, ignoring every noise.
In addition, in the case of video research (company of audience rating) also making ranking as business, we have quite a lot of reasons to be reliable. After Oricon also had this, if you do not assert your rights, that is what you are in trouble.
What is audience rating - table of contents
That's why the questionnaire on the internet is below.
Mr. Hiromichi Wright Wuyangyang was sued for remarks on "Oricon"
(http://www.oricon.co.jp/news/confidence/40446/)、あなたは最近、音
Do you think easy hit charts and rankings are credible?
Also, are you buying music with reference to it?
· "Recent" rather than "old" (the past few years)
· "Hit charts and ranking" shall include not only those provided by Oricon
· "Buy music" also includes "download from distribution site" and "borrow from rental shop"
※ Please fill in the comments section for "other" opinions
Also, the following image file is part of the complaint.
Oricon - ugaya 01.gif (GIF image, 2480 x 3507 px)
Full text is below.
Oricon- ugaya.zip
By the way, lawsuits for speech control purposes are illegal.
Lawsuit to suppress speech is illegal, orders for compensation to Takefuji · Tokyo District Court
The attorneys in charge are as follows. Clearly speaking, looking at the profile as a glance, they are tremendous.
Takumi Sogo Law Firm
http://www.takusyou.com/
Lawyer Profile
However, if it is asked whether it is a terrible lawyer corps in a true sense, it means that "?" Is only data on the page. Because lawyers' ability is determined by the following points. Remember in case you become obliged to hire a lawyer for the same reason and there is no loss.
So, next is "How to choose a good lawyer in case you are sued by a huge company"is.
Related Posts:
in Note, Posted by darkhorse_log