The US government announces that all government agencies will have a chief AI officer and AI governance committee to create an annual report summarizing risks related to AI use.



On March 28, 2024 local time, the U.S. government announced that to ensure the use of AI in public services is safe, the U.S. government will require all government agencies to ``designate a chief executive officer to oversee any AI systems they use.'' It was compulsory to put it there.

FACT SHEET: Vice President Harris Announces OMB Policy to Advance Governance, Innovation, and Risk Management in Federal Agencies' Use of Artificial Intelligence | The White House

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2024/03/28/fact-sheet-vice-president-harris-announces-omb-policy-to-advance-governance-innovation-and- risk-management-in-federal-agencies-use-of-artificial-intelligence/



The Future of AI in Government - YouTube


Every US federal agency must hire a chief AI officer - The Verge
https://www.theverge.com/2024/3/28/24114105/federal-agencies-ai-responsible-guidance-omb-caio

Biden orders every US agency to appoint a chief AI officer | Ars Technica
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/03/why-every-federal-agency-must-now-appoint-a-chief-ai-officer/

In a briefing with reporters, Vice President Kamala Harris announced new guidance (PDF file) from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), requiring all federal agencies, including OMB, to establish an AI Governance Committee, We said that we need to adjust how we use AI within.

Vice President Harris will also require all federal agencies to submit annual reports to OMB that describe all AI systems they use, the risks associated with them, and how to mitigate those risks. Masu.

Vice President Harris told reporters, ``The U.S. government will mandate that every federal agency appoint a chief AI officer with the experience and expertise to oversee all AI technologies used by that agency.'' 'This is to ensure that AI is used responsibly, and we need senior leaders across government with a specific mandate to oversee the adoption and use of AI.'

Some government agencies, including the Department of Justice, have already appointed chief AI officers since the order was announced. On the other hand, government agencies that have not appointed a chief AI officer at the time of article creation must appoint a chief AI officer within 60 days of the March 28, 2024 announcement. Additionally, if the person already appointed as chief AI officer does not have the necessary authority to coordinate the use of AI within the institution, grant additional authority or appoint another chief AI officer. need to do it.



If appointed as Chief AI Officer, you will oversee the agency's use of AI as a senior advisor on AI initiatives. OMB states that ``the use of AI may be used to improve safety and security, civil rights, civil rights, privacy, democratic values, human rights, equal opportunity, worker benefits, access to critical resources and services, trust and confidence in government agencies, ``We need to conduct a risk assessment to see how this is impacting competition in the market.''

In addition, the U.S. government will ensure that AI deployed by federal agencies 'deserves safeguards that reduce the risk of algorithmic discrimination and demonstrate transparency to the public about how the government is using AI.' We are asking you to confirm that you meet the requirements. Additionally, the U.S. government states that ``If a government agency is unable to implement safeguards against AI, and the reason for this is not for legitimate reasons, such as increasing safety or human rights risks or disrupting critical operations, may lead to the discontinuation of its use.'

Additionally, guidance from the U.S. government states that AI models, code, and data owned by federal agencies must be made available to the public unless they pose a risk to government operations.



The Brennan Center, a civil rights organization, said the order 'will serve as an important defense against AI applications that lead to racial profiling, false arrests, and mass surveillance. However, the provisions regarding halting the use of AI systems are too vague. 'And it only pays lip service to the protection of civil liberties and rights.'

Meanwhile, civil rights group CivilRights said: ``We will continue to monitor and actively cooperate with government agencies' AI initiatives, and will continue to work with them to ensure that the use of AI technology is a social good, not a civil rights violation.'' , we will work with Congress to pass rights-based legislation that provides strong guardrails for commercial use. We can protect and expand civil rights and fundamental freedoms for all of our citizens. I look forward to developing the policy.'

in Software, Posted by log1r_ut