Discussions are underway to regulate ``tap water fluoridation,'' which adjusts the fluoride concentration in tap water to prevent tooth decay, as it has a negative impact on brain development.
Food-and-Water-Watch-v-US-EPA | United States District Court, Northern District of California
https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/food-and-water-watch-v-us-epa/
Does fluoride in drinking water lower IQ? Question looms large in court battle | Science | AAAS
https://www.science.org/content/article/does-fluoride-drinking-water-lower-iq-question-looms-large-court-battle
In some areas of the United States, an initiative called ``
Previous studies have shown that fluoridated tap water reduces tooth decay rates by up to 25% in all generations compared to regular tap water.
In the United States, over 200 million people, or approximately 73% of the population, will receive conditioned tap water by 2020, and the goal is to expand to 77% of the population by 2030.
On the other hand, it has been pointed out that ingesting large amounts of fluoride may have a negative effect on brain development.
In response to these reports, the Fluoride Action Network (FAN) and other organizations have argued that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) should regulate tap water fluoridation under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). doing.
A trial is underway in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California regarding this claim, and various discussions are underway, including whether there is a safe threshold for fluoride intake.
Michael Connett, a lawyer for the plaintiffs who argues that ``tap water fluoridation should be regulated,'' said, ``Infants who are given powdered milk made using tap water are the most vulnerable of all generations of our nation.'' They are exposed to the harmful effects of monsters.' On the other hand, the EPA countered by saying, ``The prescribed level of fluoride in tap water, which is 0.7 milligrams per liter, does not have any adverse effects on the human body.'' 'Modern science and technology do not allow us to conclude that tap water fluoridation poses a health risk to humans,' attorney Paul Cainstick said.
Some dental health advocacy groups say, ``Activists advocating for regulation of tap water fluoridation are using the report to their own advantage by claiming that ``NTP suggests that there is no safe amount of fluoride intake.'' 'It is created so that it will be.' In addition, the American Dental Association is requesting that a disclaimer be added to the NTP report (PDF file) highlighting its scientific limitations.
Related Posts:
in Science, Posted by log1r_ut