Google was educating people to prohibit statements such as ``market share,'' ``enclosure,'' and ``network effect'' in order to hide violations of antitrust laws.

The US Department of Justice is suing Google for allegedly violating antitrust laws in the search engine market, and the trial has begun on September 12, 2023. During the trial, it was reported that the Department of Justice claimed that ``Google had trained its employees not to say certain words in order to avoid suspicion of violating antitrust laws.''

Googlers Told to Avoid Words Like 'Share' and 'Bundle,' US Says - Bloomberg
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2023-09-14/googlers-told-to-avoid-words-like-share-and-bundle-us-says-lmj27bhl

The U.S. Department of Justice sued Google in October 2020 for allegedly violating antitrust laws in the search engine market, and the trial began on September 12, 2023 in a federal district court in Washington. The Department of Justice has taken issue with Google's efforts to encourage major device manufacturers such as Apple and Samsung to make Google Search their default search engine in order to increase its share of Google Search. The company plans to file a lawsuit alleging that the company maintains a high level of security and creates an unfair barrier to entry for competitors.

Trial begins over whether Google violates antitrust laws in the search engine market - GIGAZINE

In the Justice Department's lawsuit against Google, the Justice Department presented a memo left in 2003 by Hal Varian, who is known for building Google's advertising model, stating that ``Google is in antitrust violation.'' In order to avoid suspicion, he instructed employees on ``expressions to avoid''.''

Specifically, words such as ``market share,'' ``scale,'' ``network effect,'' ``leverage,'' ``confinement,'' ``enclosure,'' ``bundle,'' and ``tie'' were designated as words to avoid. In addition, Google executives are said to have told employees, ``We do not 'lock up' or 'enclose' users,'' and ``We do not 'leverage' anything.'' I am.

Furthermore, in 2011, a training course named ``Antitrust Basics for Search Team'' was conducted, and Google taught employees about topics such as ``war'', ``sports'', ``wins and losses'', and ``antitrust basics for search teams''. The children were taught to avoid figurative expressions including words such as '.'

Mr. Varian, who appeared at the trial, testified, ``While he may have had informal contact with attorneys regarding these types of legal issues, he does not recall any such training being provided.'' denies the allegations.

In addition, the Justice Department's lawsuit against Google requires extensive knowledge of web browsers and search engines, but it has been reported that the judge in charge did not even have the knowledge that ``Firefox is a web browser'' .

Pointed out that the judge in charge of the Justice Department vs. Google lawsuit did not even know ``whether Firefox is a web browser or a search engine'' - GIGAZINE