Earon mask endorsed internal document 'Twitter file' that reveals the actual situation of Twitter's 'Shadow Ban' will be released
![](https://i.gzn.jp/img/2022/12/12/twitter-file-shadow-ban/00_m.jpg)
Elon Musk, who acquired Twitter and became CEO, is helping spread the thread `` Twitter file '' where journalists publish Twitter's internal information collectively, and in December 2022, `` Twitter Inside, the power of the Democratic Party supporters was overwhelmingly strong, hiding the corruption of President Biden's son.' The first `` Twitter file '' has been released. Newly, on December 9, 2022, the second ``Twitter file'' was released that reveals the actual situation of ``Shadowban'' that Twitter is secretly conducting.
THREAD: THE TWITTER FILES PART TWO.
—Bari Weiss (@bariweiss) December 9, 2022
TWITTER'S SECRET BLACKLISTS.
Among Twitter users, it is pointed out that Twitter is doing 'shadow ban' which hides specific users and posts from search results. However, in 2020, Twitter Japan's official account said, ``It is pointed out that Twitter is conducting shadowbanning, but it has never been done, nor has it been done in the past.'' Twitter denied the implementation of shadowbanning. I'm here.
Twitter has been accused of shadowbanning, but has never done so. However, in order for users to use it more comfortably, we rank tweets (in the case of displaying top tweets). You will always see tweets from accounts you follow.
— Twitter Japan (@TwitterJP) June 15, 2020
The second 'Twitter file', which reveals the reality of such a shadowban, was released on December 9, 2022. Mr. Bali Weiss, a journalist, released the second 'Twitter file', and it can be said that Mr. Mask's endorsement information because Mr. Mask quoted and retweeted it.
The Twitter Files , Part Deux!!
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 9, 2022
Below is an example of a shadow van published by Mr. Weiss. A photo that seems to be Twitter's internal system is attached, and Jay Bhattacharya of Stanford University, who claimed that ``Implementing a lockdown as a response to the new coronavirus may harm children,'' said ``Trend You can see that it is on the blacklist.
3. Take, for example, Stanford's Dr. Jay Bhattacharya ( @DrJBhattacharya ) who argued that Covid lockdowns would harm children. Twitter secretly placed him on a “Trends Blacklist,” which prevented his tweets from trending.pic.twitter.com/qTW22Zh691
—Bari Weiss (@bariweiss) December 9, 2022
According to Weiss, Shadowbang is called 'Visibility Filtering' or 'VF' inside Twitter. Twitter employees and executives say that visibility filtering can ``exclude specific users from search results'', ``make specific tweets less discoverable'', and ``exclude specific users' posts from trends''. It reveals that it was running without Also, a Twitter engineer said, ``General users don't know how much visibility we manage,'' admitting that the existence of visibility filtering was hidden from users. increase.
7. What many people call “shadow banning,” Twitter executives and employees call “Visibility Filtering” or “VF.” Multiple high-level sources confirmed its meaning.
—Bari Weiss (@bariweiss) December 9, 2022
Target users for shadowbans were primarily determined by an internal team called the 'global escalation team' or 'SRT-GET'. Both teams said they were shadowbanning up to 200 users a day.
12. The group that decided whether to limit the reach of certain users was the Strategic Response Team - Global Escalation Team, or SRT-GET.
—Bari Weiss (@bariweiss) December 9, 2022
The above team selected shadowbanned users according to Twitter's content policy, but the team called 'Site Integrity Policy and Policy Escalation Support (SIP-PES)' has its own criteria regardless of the content policy. I was deciding who to ban. Mr. Jack Dorsey and Mr. Paragu Agrawal, who were CEOs of Twitter, also participated in SIP-PES.
13. But there existed a level beyond official ticketing, beyond the rank-and-file moderators following the company's policy on paper. That is the “Site Integrity Policy, Policy Escalation Support,” known as “SIP-PES.”
—Bari Weiss (@bariweiss) December 9, 2022
In SIP-PES, politically sensitive decisions were being made. Below is an example of an account that was subject to scrutiny by SIP-PES. `` Libs of TikTok '', which is known as an anti-LGBT account, is designated as a `` trend blacklist '', and a warning message is displayed at the top of the screen, ``Do not make changes to the account without consulting with SIP-PES.'' I'm here.
16. One of the accounts that rose to this level of scrutiny was @libsoftiktok —an account that was on the “Trends Blacklist” and was designated as “Do Not Take Action on User Without Consulting With SIP-PES.” pic.twitter. com/Vjo6YxYbxT
—Bari Weiss (@bariweiss) December 9, 2022
Below is a message sent to the company's Slack in 2021 by Yoel Roth, who was head of the Trust & Safety Department. Ross tells his in-house research team that research needs to progress to expand ``non-delete interventions, such as disabling engagement and visibility filtering.'' In addition, Mr. Ross said , 'We also got Jack's consent.' From this, we can see that Twitter executives were actively involved in the expansion of Shadowban.
24. Six days later, in a direct message with an employee on the Health, Misinformation, Privacy, and Identity research team, Roth requested more research to support expanding “non-removal policy interventions like disabling engagements and deamplification/visibility filtering.” pic .twitter.com/lqiJapHjct
—Bari Weiss (@bariweiss) December 9, 2022
After the second ``Twitter file'' revealing the reality of the Shadowban was released, Mr. Mask said, ``The rules were applied to the right and not to the left,'' and Shadowban is mainly the Republican Party. It claims it was conducted against members and Republican supporters.
As @bariweiss clearly describes, the rules were enforced against the right, but not against the left
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 9, 2022
Related Posts:
in Web Service, Posted by log1o_hf