Why does 'sleep read' make people's mind uneasy?

If you are communicating with friends via SNS or a message application, you may have not readily get a reply, although the other party should have read the message you sent. The reason why this state which is sometimes called " read through " is disturbing is explained in the conversation of academic media.

Message sent, received but no instant reply: how does that make you feel?
https://theconversation.com/message-sent-received-but-no-instant-reply-how-does-that-make-you-feel-101110

For SNS and the message application, it has a "read notice" function that informs you that the other party has read their message. For example in LINE the "read" character is displayed beside the message, in the message application WhatsApp it displays a blue checkmark when the message is successfully transmitted, and when the other person reads the message another blue check mark Is displayed.

If you see a read notification in the message you sent, it means "the other party has read that message", and you tend to think that there will be a reply from the other party immediately. In fact, however, there are not many replies, it often happens that one hour elapses after waiting for reply.

Many people implicitly have a social agreement that "When you are exchanging messages online, you immediately reply to the other person when you see a message that you want a reply." Many people feel uncomfortable with others when the communication standards that people implicitly have are broken. Of course, it is different thing to feel when thru slewed by people, but it feels as if many people were rejected, I think that I am isolated. If you think that "The other party is dare ignoring your own message", anxiety will increase with the passage of time, and "Hey" "You read a message" "Why will not you give me a reply?" Sometimes I send a pursuit to reply to the opponent.

David Cowan , a lecturer at psychology at the University of Queensland, explains why on read why so far makes the mind uneasy, said, "People have the same communication paradigm as face-to-face conversations online Because I also tend to expect also for communication of. "

For example, in real-world communication, everyone is uncomfortable when they talk to someone but there is no response, and it is obviously observed that the other person is listening to these words and being ignored. Many people try to speak further and try to bring back a reply, or some people get angry if it does not go well. When bringing in the same rules like this for online exchange, I feel a big anxiety when I have been read through.

Cowan says that it is not surprising to try to bring real-world rules online, given how many people are currently exchanging messages online. On top of that, there are also many people who are bothering such an on-line connection, some of them going to actions to shut out online connections called " gosting ".

Even though it is intimate relationship with the partner, if you do not receive a response to the message you will feel like humorous or rejected. However, if a relationship of trust with the other party can be built, even if the reply is delayed, the emotion returns immediately after adding a word such as "I am sorry I could not answer a bit because I am busy. . Some people dare not to return messages, sometimes use the technique of dominating opponents, but most people do not have malicious intent to read through. In this era of increased online interaction, Mr. Cowan said that it is necessary to establish a new communication paradigm.