The AI ​​can do the processing of the secret agreement retention (NDA) more quickly and accurately than the lawyer

LawGeex, which provides automatic checking service for contracts, conducted a survey that 20 AIs and 20 lawyers " treat five confidentiality agreements (NDAs) and examine their accuracy". The result that AI was quick and excellent was announced.

AI vs Lawyers: The Ultimate Showdown | Law Geex
https://www.lawgeex.com/AIvsLawyer/

Even if it says "lawyer" from pin to kiri, did you choose a lawyer so that LawGeex would be advantageous? Although it is natural to have the question of "a new lawyer without practical experience" and others who do not include Goldman Sachs, a person who has work experience at a major company such as Cisco, etc. Naturally People who have experience are chosen.

The five NDA used for the test are fairly general contents, and 30 legal issues involved. The number of sheets is 11 pages on A4 paper, the number of paragraphs is 153, and the number of clauses is 3213. The lawyer 20 people said that they had the treatment done within 4 hours limit time.

As a result, AI won 94% in terms of accuracy and 85% of 20 lawyers, victory.

AI said that he showed the same power as a highly capable lawyer.

At the processing speed, the average of 20 lawyers was "92 minutes", while AI won by 26 seconds in a moment. Even lawyers who could process in the shortest time took 51 minutes.

For the methodology of the study, lawyers at Stanford University and Duke University each closely investigated. Test checks are handled by independent veteran lawyer Christopher Ray and the possibility that results are products of random opportunities has been shown to be "less than 0.7%."

Although the result of this time does not indicate that "the work of an attorney can replace AI", it is highly likely that AI will be able to improve the efficiency of checking contracts, which is a task routinely performed by lawyers It is considered.