Problems of keeping better results than people

ByRawpixel.com

There is a person who combines all the talent, motivation, diligence and the like, there is certainly a person who raises the company to the next higher level by one person, and in the research conducted in recent years the top performer is an average employee 20 It is told that it is also said to demonstrate productivity as much as 30 times. However, as behaviorist scientist Francesca Gino said, hiring such a high performer is actually quite risky.

Robin Hood Under the Hood: Wealth-Based Discrimination in Illicit Customer Help | Organization Science
http://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/orsc.1090.0498

Hot shots and cool reception? An expanded view of social consequences for high performers.
http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2017-06323-001

The Problem with Being a Top Performer - Scientific American
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-problem-with-being-a-top-performer/

In Hollywood's example, the movie "Philadelphia"When"Forest · Gump / Ichigo Ichigo"Tom Hanks, who won the Academy Award for Best Actor Award, is the top performer. Many of the critics said that Tom Hanks starred "Apollo 13"Private Ryan"cast awayHowever, in these movies, Tom Hanks was unable to gather enough votes from the same actors and did not win the Academy Awards. About this, some critics said, "Although Tom Hanks deserved the award, actors jealous of winning the third Oscar did not intentionally vote," There are people who have it.

I can not ascertain if the hypothesis about Tom Hanks is true, but colleagues trying to lower the performance of top performers are not unusual. If there are people who are "work too early" among the factory workers, the performance of the entire work is improved by the presence of that person, so the managers have come to predict high outcome, and other workers are convinced Sometimes there are things. A high productivity high performer appears to be a threat to others.

It is said that "people compare comparisons with others when evaluating themselves"Social comparative theoryLarimer Peace of Olymp Business School and Mr. Gino of Harvard Business School said that the degree of affluence of the owner of the car is in the eyes of the checker of the car exhaust check I examined from the data how much it affects. The prediction of the two people at this time was "even if the vehicle can not pass the test originally, if the owner of the car is the average income, the inspector will pass the car in the sense that it will help the owner."

As a result of the investigation, the fraudulent level when targeting customers who earn as much income as the inspector is higher than the fraud level when targeting people who are getting high income He said that. In addition, when the laboratory tested the subject as an inspector, people who served as inspectors saw that it was easier for fraud to work for people driving ordinary cars than those driving luxury cars It is said that it came out. This suggests that people change decisions and behaviors to opponents, depending on whether or not they are superior to themselves.

ByCity Spidey

Elizabeth Campbell, associate professor of the University of Minnesota and others, surveyed 350 stylists working in a salon located in Taiwan. In this salon, stylists work in groups and are required to succeed in activities both in individuals and in groups. The result of the investigation is that stylists with high performance are more susceptible to slandering and lower reputation than stylists with poor performance. Moreover, the more cooperative team I knew, the tremendous handling of high performers.

In addition, the research team conducted a control experiment on 284 students majoring in business. This is a virtual experiment, assigning subjects randomly to "cooperative group" and "competitive group"Critical thinkingAnd to test the analysis thinking. In addition, one of each group was mixed with high performers who work equivalent or superior to the subject's teammates.

The result of this experiment is that the reaction to the high performer will change depending on whether team resources are limited or not. As resources are limited, team members receive high performance as a threat and compete, but in environments where resources are shared within the team, members benefit from the performance of high performers , Teammates will be cooperative with high performers.

ByAndrew Neel

In other words, what we found through a series of surveys is that when we judge myself as "we can not achieve grades like opponent" compared to others, unless we are actively interested in "wanting cooperation" It means trying to drop performers strategically.

Those who work wonderfully for managers are hard to find and are difficult to attract to their company. However, in the business world, "competition" often occurs, so high performers tend to be lonely when entering the team. In order to take advantage of the high performer's work, it is necessary for colleagues to clearly indicate that "they can benefit by becoming cooperative with high performers".