Whether information to kill suicide with hydrogen sulfide should be deleted from the net or not?

After the police finally found a method of hydrogen sulfide suicide on the net, I decided to make a policy to request deletion, but what is actually like?

Also, there is no responsibility for the mass communication that has continued to advertise hydrogen sulfide suicide, is there responsibility only for the net?

As a representative example, see what kind of correspondence the 2 channel and web fishery is dealing with, the hot topic being done at Wikipedia which appears at the top of the search result at the present time, and seeing what it really is Let's.
First of all, this is the police's future deletion request policy on the net.

(PDF file) About the handling of information that induces the production of hydrogen sulfide gas

In order to be judged that the production of hydrogen sulfide gas has been attracted, in addition to the information on the method for producing hydrogen sulfide gas,
○ Invite manufacturing (easy to make etc.)
○ Attract usage (easy and secure death etc)
It is necessary to be recognized.
Incidentally, those that are judged to be academic purposes, such as being only descriptions of chemical formulas or the like, do not apply.

So, in case of 2 chan you are planning to respond to these deletion requests? At the moment it seems to be the following policy.

Mental: Men's salon [Thread removed]
http://qb5.2ch.net/test/read.cgi/saku/1185932089/213

☆ Thread of hydrogen sulfide suicide from administrator "Because it does not touch the law
Even if it is asked for deletion it is OK to leave it. "

Since it is said that even if there is a request to delete, basically do not touch the law, so we will "ignore" policy.

nextWeb pioneeringIt is the case. On the following page, a deletion request mail from the person in charge of cybercrime countermeasures official of the living security department of the Okinawa prefectural police headquarters life safety department is released.

【Okinawa Prefectural Police Department】 About deletion of information that may induce hydrogen sulfide gas production (request)

In contrast, the web fishery sideSuch correspondenceIt seems to have dealt with.

Okinawa Prefectural Police Headquarters Lifestyle Safety Division Life Security Division Cyber ​​Crime Countermeasure Section
Dear ○ ○

Thank you for your help.
I am ○ ○ who is in charge of web fishery.

We have so far been concerned with child pornography and former discrimination bribes
We have been deleted frequently upon request from government related organizations.
However, we can not accept requests for this matter at the moment.

The reason is two points below.

(1) Contrary to freedom of expression

The act of suggesting a crime to a specific opponent is a crime
It is not the case to show the way of crime to unspecified majority.
"You can stab the person's belly if you use a kitchen knife" or "If you have a lighter, oil and newspaper you can fire it"
It is not much different from saying.

Although the above example is "harmful" information
Japanese have the freedom to express it.

As you requested, simply deleting all harmful information which is "how to commit suicide" and the world becomes "clean"
But what if the suicide did not decrease?
If all the areas that are now regarded as gray zones disappear completely, is not it now treated as gray?
Now I can easily imagine TV stations saying "Do not treat suicide positively with drama etc." or publishing world and the movie circle saying "Contrain dealing with suicide is self-refusing".
"Artworks in which suicide is positively expressed" is only one of the common themes also known as puppet joruri in the Edo period.

The deletion requirement in the attached document
> Invite manufacturing
> Invite usage
There is no legal basis for criteria such as:
If the police take the attitude to prescribe and eliminate "harmful" on these arbitrary criteria
The story above can not be called a dream story.

(2) It is difficult to think that suicide will decrease

Because people have information, it is considered not to commit suicide but to kill themselves by the circumstances of that person.
Extreme stories, because everyone knows how to hang hanging with a sense of mind.

Police are trying to achieve the goal of "reducing the suicide caused by hydrogen sulfide that is now in circulation"
To simply show the pose you are working on
I think that I thought of such an easy thing
The ad hoc way will have a negative impact on society.
We are concerned about police response.

Thank you.

As the main reason, "Freedom of Expression" is raised, again, the deletion request is refused.

And Wikipedia has its own "Hydrogen sulfideThere is an item called "here"NoteA great debate is being held over by. Among them, "On the handling of exploitable information (Nature, examples of Science, etc.)Part of the information is gathered very helpful information.

Although detailed contents are deposited in the link above, in order to prove that it is reliable and repeatable experimental data, it is necessary for scientists to present detailed experimental methods in the paper, but such information In the complicated circumstance that studies on these dangerous pathogens may be abused as terrorists, etc., on the other hand, research on these dangerous pathogens is necessary not only for bioterrorism themselves but also for acquiring important knowledge for defense from bioterrorism So, scientists have a big dilemma in the present situation.

From the era of this era, in early 2003 the American Academy of Sciences issued a statement in collaboration with editors of major scientific journals including Nature and Science (a summary of Nature's articles and Science magazine. For Japanese translation of concrete content, see the lecture above). To put it shortly,

(1) Explain to society the necessity to publish scientific information that can be exploited in academic papers to society,

(2) On the other hand, it was content to express that it dealt with by dismissing the adoption in the process of reviewing papers for items with extremely large disadvantages only to be disclosed.

This statement was a fairly impactful statement for scientists, so if you are a scientist (at least in a field like reading through Nature and Science) I think that it is somewhat caught in the ear Well, if you are not a researcher at that time, you do not have to wonder if there is no need to know.

The outline at this time is explained on the following page.

The Veterinary Society of Japan Veterinary Infectious Disease (142)

We recognize the legal interest in the abuse of information published from the point of view of bioterrorism, but we also recognize that research in exactly the same area is crucial for social defense. We will respond responsibly to the safety and security issues that the published papers may cause.

Sometimes the editor may conclude that the risk of presentation outweighs the scientific benefits. In such a case, reworking may be requested or rejected. Scientific information is also conveyed in seminars, lectures, homepages, etc. The magazine and the scientific community play an important role for researchers to maximize public benefits and minimize the risk of abuse by research results.

In other words, if it is obvious that the disadvantage exceeds the merit by disclosing information, it is a policy not to publish.

The problem is "The disadvantage is superior to the meritOf course, it is a point that it is not a misunderstanding due to dogmatism and prejudice, it should be indicated with clear numerical values ​​by objective investigation, and it should judge from the result.

In addition, although it is speculated only, the cause of the increase in suicide by hydrogen sulfide increased is the result of coverage by television and newspaper, and it is considered that the following flow is occurring.

· Phase 1 "Promote the existence of new suicide measures"
When television and newspaper report on hydrogen sulfide suicide, we frequently use expressions such as "Searching for suicide on the net" and "Understanding by examining on the net"
↓
· Stage 2 "Detail of suicide method"
A person (suicide volunteer) who is interested in suicide method searches by net search
↓
· Stage 3 "Decide to commit suicide"
Investigate the method, which was said in television and newspaper on the net, know, to commit suicide
↓
· Fourth stage "occurrence of suicide loop"
Television and newspaper again repeatedly repeat from the first stage, using the expressions like "I searched for the suicide method on the net" or "I will find out by examining it on the net" intensely and interestingly

In other words, despite extensive publicity that new suicide measures are available, reports are not being made on the premise that there are a large number of people considering suicide in viewers and readers. That's why.

for that reason,"WHO recommendation of "About suicide case prevention report to prevent suicide""Is shown as follows.

1) what to do
· Emphasize alternatives to suicide.
· Introduce help lines and regional support organizations.
· Describe the physical damage (brain damage, paralysis, etc.) when suicide is attempted.

2) What to Avoid
· Do not publish photos or wills.
· Do not report details of the suicide measures used.
· Do not report the cause of suicide by simplifying it.
· Avoid suicide beautification and sensational coverage.
· Do not report using religious or cultural stereotypes.

As a result of paying attention to these things, the case is old, but in Austria's Vienna in 1984-1987 the suicide decreased by 80% in half a year. In Japan, there is almost no such thing as "reporting to prevent suicide", so for example "Suicide prevention comprehensive countermeasure centerEven just adding it to the end, a considerable effect may be expected. This is for the Cabinet OfficeSuicide measures homepageBut it is pointed out and the results of public opinion survey are also published as follows.

4. On expectations for voluntary efforts toward the mass communication

(1) Expectation of efforts to report
When media such as newspapers and television reports about suicide, it is said that it is effective for suicide prevention depending on the way of reporting. In particular, when I heard what kind of coverage is considered to be effective in suicide prevention, the percentage of those who cited "providing information on counselors of troubles" was the highest at 52.3%, and " (46.7%), "Do not report on suicide in detail" (37.6%), "Provide information on the sign of suicide and response method" (35.8%), etc. There. (Multiple answers up to 3, top 4 items)

It should be noted that representatives of LifeLink describing the WHO recommendation mentioned above complain about their series of hydrogen sulfide suicide reports naturally in their own blogs and also show concrete measures.

Life link representative diary: Listening to the voice of "Galleries canary" ~ Thinking of "hydrogen sulfide suicide" coverage -

What can be considered is a long-term measure to approach emergency evacuation measures and fundamental problems.

There are two major points regarding emergency evacuation measures.
One thing is to refresh how to report. With reference to WHO's "suicide report guidelines", it is to transform it into reports that contribute to measures against suicide.

Another is measures on the net. When searching "Suicide" or "Hydrogen sulfide", make sure that the HP of the consultation window is searched first. In addition, to enter 2 counters and suicide bulletin boards, etc., the HP address of the consultation counter as a counter. By doing so, you should "neutralize" the situation where only information that goes towards suicide is gathering, by increasing the information heading towards living.

There are also two long-term measures.
One thing is to do "training to confess trouble" in training, "training to convey it when feeling want to die".
Suicide Prevention Education is apt to be "to teach the importance of life" at once, but even children are already aware of "what life is important", and the problem is that the "important I think that it is to teach me how to ask for help when I can not keep my life.

Another thing is to "make it an attractive society worth living". For that purpose, we should establish a mechanism for society to "learn from death" more. I think that it is necessary to create a mechanism to reflect the opinions of the parties in the measures.

In other words, it is not important to "cover odors".

Indeed, only hydrogen sulfide suicide has been reported, but in Japan approximately 30,000 people committed suicide every year, and it is calculated that about 90 people commit suicide every day on average.

The data summarized by the Regional Division of the National Police Agency Lifestyle Safety Bureau is present, and "(PDF file) Outline of Suicide in Heisei era 2006 [PDF]According to the following, it is as follows.

· Total number of suicide in 2006:
32,155 people (down 397 people from the previous year)

· Gender of suicide:
There were 22,813 men and 70.9%

· Age of suicide:
"Over 60 years old" (11,120 people, 34.6%)
"50s" (7,246 people, 22.5%)
"40s" (5,008 people, 15.6%)
"30s" (4,497 people, 14.0%)

· Occupation of suicide:
"Unemployed people" (15,412 people, 47.9%)
"Employees" (8,163 people, 25.4%)
"Self-employed" (3, 567 people, 11.1%)
"Housewife / husband" (2, 658 people, 8.3%)

· Cause of the suicide · Motivated situation (in the case of only the will):
"Health problems" (4,341 people, 41.5%)
"Economic and life problems" (3,010 people, 28.8%)
"Family problems" (1,043 people, 10.0%)
"Work problem" (709 people, 6.8%)

Finally, the contacts that can consult before committing suicide and the pages where you should look before it are as follows.

To you who are considering hydrogen sulfide suicide

Japan's Lion Telephone Federation - National Life Story