Meta announces 'Facebook Jail', system renovation to delete policy violation content
On February 23, 2023, local time, Monica Bickert, vice president of content policy at Meta, announced ` ` Facebook Jail '' as a new system for removing policy-violating content. Facebook Jail aims to be fairer and more effective than traditional penalty systems, with a focus on helping users understand why content was removed.
How We're Improving Facebook's Penalty System | Meta
Meta announces 'Facebook Jail' reforms that focus more on better explanations of policy, less on 'timeouts' | TechCrunch
https://techcrunch.com/2023/02/23/meta-announces-facebook-jail-reforms-that-focus-more-on-better-explanations-of-policy-less-on-timeouts/
Meta has received feedback from the Oversight Board , an independent body of experts, academics, educators and lawyers, to improve the penalty system for policy-violating content . And as a fair and effective penalty system based on feedback, we announced a new penalty system 'Facebook Jail' that updated the conventional system.
An independent watchdog, the Oversight Board, has long expressed concern about Facebook's penalty system, calling it 'disproportionate and opaque.' The Oversight Board advises Facebook to be more transparent with users it penalizes under its penalty system, allowing users to explain the context of their offending posts when appealing Meta's decision. It seems that you asked for it.
Based on this feedback, the updated Facebook Jail focuses less on restricting users' ability to post and more on explaining the reasons behind content removal. In most cases, the new system will apply penalties that limit the user's ability to post, ``cannot post content for 30 days'' after 7 policy violations.
Bickert said of Facebook Jail, “We are making this change because we understand that
At Facebook Jail, the decision-making process for removing policy-violating content remains unchanged. However, by explaining the policy to users when policy violations occur, it increases transparency about decision making. Until now, Meta's platform users hadn't understood what was wrong with their content and had it removed, Meta explained. It seems that some users did not realize that they had been penalized until they suddenly could not post.
Meta's analysis of the traditional penalty system found that nearly 80% of low-strike users did not re-violate the policy for 60 days after receiving a strike. Therefore, Meta will apply more severe penalties to users who have received more than 7 strikes, aiming to 'give well-meaning people the necessary guidance while eliminating malicious people.'
Meta also takes immediate action, including account deletion, on posts containing 'terrorism, child exploitation, human trafficking, promoting suicide, sexual exploitation, selling non-medical drugs, or promoting dangerous individuals or organizations.' is going to be implemented.
Overseas media TechCrunch points out that Meta's Facebook Jail is 'the result of years of user protests and external pressure.' In the United States, Republican lawmakers have long argued that technology companies such as Facebook, Google, and Twitter are conducting conservative censorship, and in recent years have asked technology companies to provide detailed explanations about individual decisions.
The Oversight Board praises Meta's new Facebook Jail, but points out that there is 'room for improvement' in terms of transparency regarding critical strikes.
Related Posts:
in Web Service, Posted by logu_ii