arXiv, a repository of unpeer-reviewed papers, has announced a policy of banning submissions for one year if a paper contains errors due to LLM (Lesson Licensing) or fictitious citations.

Thomas G. Dietrich, Professor Emeritus at Oregon State University and head of the Computer Science section at the unpeer-reviewed paper repository 'arXiv,' has announced a new policy on X (formerly Twitter) stating that 'the author is responsible for any errors caused by generative AI tools.'

Attention @arxiv authors: Our Code of Conduct states that by signing your name as an author of a paper, each author takes full responsibility for all its contents, irrespective of how the contents were generated. 1/

— Thomas G. Dietterich (@tdietterich) May 14, 2026

Dietrich stated, 'arXiv's policy stipulates that by signing as an author of a paper, each author assumes full responsibility for all of its content, regardless of how it was generated.' He then clarified, 'If a generative AI tool generates inappropriate language, plagiarized content, biased content, errors, mistakes, inaccurate references, or misleading content, or if that output is included in a scholarly work, it is the author's responsibility.'

If generative AI tools generate inappropriate language, plagiarized content, biased content, errors, mistakes, incorrect references, or misleading content, and that output is included in scientific works, it is the responsibility of the author(s). 2/

— Thomas G. Dietterich (@tdietterich) May 14, 2026

Furthermore, 'if there is undeniable evidence that the authors did not verify the results of generation using LLM, it means that nothing written in the paper can be trusted.'

We have recently clarified our penalties for this. If a submission contains incontrovertible evidence that the authors did not check the results of LLM generation, this means we can't trust anything in the paper. 3/

— Thomas G. Dietterich (@tdietterich) May 14, 2026

This 'unmistakable evidence' includes fictitious quotations and references generated by the LLM's hallucination, as well as meta-comments from the LLM such as, 'Here is a 200-word summary. Do you want to change it?' and 'This table is illustrative; please enter the actual values obtained from your experiment.'

Examples of incontrovertible evidence: hallucinated references, meta-comments from the LLM ('here is a 200 word summary; would you like me to make any changes?'; 'the data in this table is illustrative, fill it in with the real numbers from your experiments') end/

— Thomas G. Dietterich (@tdietterich) May 14, 2026

If a submission contains a clear error by the LLM, the authors will be penalized with a one-year ban from submitting to arXiv. Furthermore, if they wish to submit to arXiv again after another year, they must submit to a reputable peer-reviewed academic media.

The penalty is a 1-year ban from arXiv followed by the requirement that subsequent arXiv submissions must first be accepted at a reputable peer-reviewed venue. 4/

— Thomas G. Dietterich (@tdietterich) May 14, 2026

As of the time of writing, Dietrich's post has not yet been reflected in arXiv's policies, so it appears it hasn't been implemented yet. Nevertheless, it seems that in the future, heavy penalties will be imposed on those who submit shoddy papers using generative AI.

arXiv Policies - arXiv info
https://info.arxiv.org/help/policies/index.html