'The theory that ChatGPT came up with the Trump tariffs' emerges, with people talking about how the formula for calculating tariffs is too rough

In the reciprocal tariffs
Trump's new tariff math looks a lot like ChatGPT's | The Verge
https://www.theverge.com/news/642620/trump-tariffs-formula-ai-chatgpt-gemini-claude-grok
Critics suspect Trump's weird tariff math came from chatbots - Ars Technica
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/04/critics-suspect-trumps-weird-tariff-math-came-from-chatbots/
President Trump has announced a tariff policy that would impose a flat 10% tariff on all trade partners around the world, with each country adding on top of that with tariffs of up to 50%.
Trump administration imposes reciprocal tariffs on Japan: 24%, including non-tariff barriers https://t.co/nHCgLytuWq
— Nikkei Electronic Edition (@nikkei) April 2, 2025
The US has declared its trade deficit and deindustrialization a 'national emergency' and will impose tariffs using presidential authority. The EU tariff rate is 20% and China's is 34%. pic.twitter.com/SmaLeBW5ot
It has been explained that the additional amount was calculated taking into account each country's tariffs and non-tariff barriers , but the specific basis for the calculation has not been provided.
When the tax rate was announced, it was quickly pointed out that it was derived from a very simple formula. Journalist James Surowiecki wrote on X (formerly Twitter) that 'I found out where these fake tariffs came from. Contrary to what they say, they're not actually calculated from tariffs and non-tariff barriers. Instead, for every country, they just divide the trade deficit with that country by the amount of exports that country has to the US. This is nonsense.'
Just figured out where these fake tariff rates come from. They didn't actually calculate tariff rates + non-tariff barriers, as they say they did. Instead, for every country, they just took our trade deficit with that country and divided it by the country's exports to us.
— James Surowiecki (@JamesSurowiecki) April 2, 2025
So we… https://t.co/PBjF8xmcuv
According to Surowiecki, the US trade deficit with Indonesia is $17.9 billion, while Indonesia's exports are $28 billion. Therefore, the calculation is '179 ÷ 280 = 64%, which is the same as what President Trump claims as Indonesia's tariff rate on the US. The 'reduced reciprocal tariffs' that the US imposes on Indonesia are the result divided in half.

What’s more, when social media users asked leading chatbots, including ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude and Grok, how to eliminate the trade deficit, they were surprisingly consistent in coming up with the formula: “deficit divided by exports.”
Confirmed, chatgpt... exactly what the dumbest kid in the class would do, without edits
https://t.co/6Zlk04lu3v pic.twitter.com/Gp4hmG9Rro — Wojtek Kopczuk 🇵🇱🇺🇦 and 🇺🇲 (@wwwojtekk) April 2, 2025
In fact, when The Verge asked four major chatbots for a simple way to calculate the tariffs the United States should impose to balance the bilateral trade deficit between the United States and its trading partners and bring the bilateral trade deficit to zero, they all gave the same answer.
There were subtle differences in the answers of each chatbot - for example, Grok and Claude both suggested halving the tariffs of the other country to come up with a 'reasonably discounted reciprocal tariff,' but they disagreed on whether a 10% basic tariff should be added to the total tariff rate. Still, The Verge says the four chatbots' answers had more in common than differences.
I tried asking Grok a question and got the following response:
The AIs acknowledged that the calculation of tariff rates was too rough, with ChatGPT telling Ars Technica, a foreign media outlet that conducted a similar test, 'This simple method ignores the complex dynamics of international trade.' Gemini, which issued the most stern warning, emphasized that 'this is only a highly simplified conceptual approach that ignores the enormous complexities of the real world.'
Even the most optimistic Grok said, 'Imposing tariffs is not necessarily an easy way to do it.' In fact, Grok's response above includes the sentences, 'This calculation is only a theoretical guideline, as trade is affected not only by simple bilateral relations but also by global supply chains and exchange rates,' and 'This is a gross simplification of the real economic situation, and more detailed data and analysis are needed for practical purposes.'
The Verge said, 'It's unclear whether the Trump campaign used AI tools to create this easy trade policy, and we don't know how a chatbot that just spits out information from its training data arrived at this particular formula. But regardless of how the tariffs were devised, the whole world is watching to see if they go into effect on April 5, 2025, and if so, how the Trump campaign's rough calculations will affect international trade.'
Related Posts:
in Software, Posted by log1l_ks