Judgment prohibits Biden administration officials from contacting social media companies due to excessive government efforts to curb misinformation
Prohibits Biden administration officials from contacting social media companies regarding “controlling posts protected by the First Amendment,” citing excessive federal regulation of social media companies I know that a decision has been made. It is hoped that this will draw a line between policing and censoring misinformation on social media.
STATE OF MISSOURI ET AL v. JOSEPH BIDEN JR ET AL (2023)
(PDF file)
US judge blocks Biden officials from contacts with social media companies - The Washington Post
Judge Orders Biden Officials to Limit Contact With Social-Media Companies - WSJ
https://www.wsj.com/articles/judge-rules-biden-administration-likely-trampled-on-free-speech-on-social-media-29334362
Triggered by the suspicion that Russia interfered in the 2016 US presidential election, the movement to strengthen cooperation between the government and social media companies in the United States became active. We have developed close relationships to deal with those who disrupt public health by spreading misinformation about
However, in these efforts, some voices questioned the Biden administration's broad censorship powers, which can also exclude 'politically undesirable information' and its speakers, and the government's suppression of speech. There is also an objection that it is connected to
Following this trend, Republican attorneys general in Louisiana and Missouri have filed lawsuits against the Biden administration. The complaint alleges that the Biden administration is facilitating a large-scale censorship campaign in the name of rooting out the disinformation that is prevalent on social media, starting with the health policy issues of the new coronavirus infection, Questions about the origins of the coronavirus, the so-called ' laptop problem ' where sexual photos leaked from the laptop of President Biden's second son, Hunter Biden, election security issues, and other conflicts Attorneys general allege that the Biden administration violated the First Amendment, which provides for freedom of expression and freedom of the press, by pressuring the administration to eradicate unfavorable views on the topic.
Louisiana U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty echoed the Attorneys General's allegations, in a ruling that the Biden administration's crackdown on social media postings likely violated the First Amendment. citing White House officials and several federal agencies for public opinion and speech normally protected from government censorship, and urging them to contact social media companies for the purpose of suppressing such speech. I have issued a restraining order.
The judge's order covers several federal agencies, including the Departments of Justice, State, Health and Human Services, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, as well as Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorcas and Gen. More than a dozen bureaucrats are also named, including Mr. Easterly.
Judge Doughty was nominated by then-President Trump in 2017 and approved by a 98-0 vote, and was responsible for the mandate to vaccinate against COVID-19 under the Biden administration, as well as the new oil and gas industry. Known for being a Republican-leaning judge who has blocked orders regulating gas drilling. In his ruling, Judge Doty allowed some exceptions, such as warnings of national security threats, criminal activity, and voter suppression, and continued to allow government involvement in these efforts.
'This injunction is so broad that it's intended to chill any relationship between government officials and social media,' said Evelyn Dwek, an assistant professor at Stanford Law School. He points out that it lacks clear guidance as to where the line should be drawn.
'The Justice Department is reviewing the court's injunction and is evaluating its choices in this case,' a senior White House official said. 'Our consistent view is that social media companies have a responsibility to make independent choices about the information they present, while considering the impact their platforms have on the American public.' .
Related Posts:
in Web Service, Posted by log1p_kr