The US RESTRICT law, which seems to be hostile to TikTok, regulates services in a wide range, not just TikTok
In the United States, measures are being taken to ban services deemed 'security risky', including TikTok, and a bipartisan group of senators announced the ``Law Limiting the Occurrence of Threats that Endanger Information and Communication Technology ( RESTRICT Act)” has been newly submitted. American populist YouTube channel
The 'Insanely Broad' RESTRICT Act Could Ban Much More Than Just TikTok
https://www.vice.com/en/article/4a3ddb/restrict-act-insanely-broad-ban-tiktok-vpns
Regarding the SNS 'TikTok' owned by the major Chinese technology company ByteDance, attempts to limit its use are underway in each country due to concerns that user data may leak to China. However, since no evidence has been found to support these concerns, it has been pointed out that foreign companies simply want to avoid the economic and geopolitical impact that they have on the domestic market.
TikTok's Chu CEO testified at an American hearing and responded to data leak suspicions - GIGAZINE
Ryan Grimm and Emily Jasinski, who appeared in Breaking Point, are focusing on the newly submitted bill `` RESTRICT law '' in the United States. This is a bill submitted by a bipartisan group of senators for the purpose of protecting information and communication technology. There are many clauses that apply.
A bipartisan group submits a bill for the `` RESTRICT Act '' that regulates the use of applications and technologies with security risks such as TikTok - GIGAZINE
Regarding this, Mr. Jasinski pointed out, ``If a bill aimed at something does not have a specific word, it indicates that the scope of the word is too broad.'' Wilmarie Escort, a policy analyst at digital rights group Access Now, echoed a similar sentiment, noting that the restrictions of the RESTRICT Act are so wide-ranging that they may have serious implications for human and civil rights. doing.
Under the RESTRICT Act, the Department of Commerce is said to identify 'information and communication technology products of some interest to foreign adversaries or that pose an unacceptable risk to national security.' The bill only applies to technology that leads to 'foreign adversaries,' which include China, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia and Venezuela.
The text of the bill contains ambiguous terms such as 'desktop application', 'mobile application', 'game application', 'payment application', and 'web-based application', and effectively targets SNS such as TikTok and various VPN services. It is
“The text of the RESTRICT law criminalizes the use of VPNs and the security tools people use for privacy and security,” Escort said of the bill, which could have wide-ranging restrictions beyond specific services. Many individuals and organizations, including journalists, activists and human rights defenders, use VPNs to protect their online activities from surveillance and censorship. would expose these groups to surveillance and repression, which could affect freedom of speech and expression.'
``In general, the majority of Congress has no interest in privacy and little understanding,'' said Breaking Point's Grimm. By submitting the RESTRICT law, lawmakers are developing the argument to `` protect the data of the public, '' but Mr. Grimm said, `` In fact, we are expanding the authority to monitor a large number of people. I am throwing
Meanwhile, Senator Mark Warner, who led the bill's introduction, said through communication director Rachel Cohen, 'This bill will prevent companies such as Kaspersky, HUAWEI, and TikTok from posing systemic risks to America's national security. It's aimed head-on, not against individual users.' He added, ``The standard for criminal penalties in this bill is incredibly high and does not apply to individual users of TikTok or VPNs.''
Related Posts:
in Web Service, Posted by log1p_kr