Summary of 'OnePlus 10T' overseas reviews, many voices that are satisfied with the speed of operation but regret the reduced functions
Chinese smartphone maker OPPO subsidiary OnePlus has launched the
OnePlus 10T review: Powerful and contentious
https://www.androidpolice.com/oneplus-10t-review/
OnePlus 10T review: Speed above all | Engadget
The OnePlus 10T returns to a winning formula of high specs, low ($649!) price | Ars Technica
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/08/the-oneplus-10t-brings-back-good-flagship-smartphone-pricing-649/
OnePlus 10T is a Pixel 6 from another reality - 9to5Google
https://9to5google.com/2022/08/03/oneplus-10t-hands-on/
OnePlus 10T Review: Zippy but Bland | WIRED
https://www.wired.com/review/oneplus-10t/
The overall opinion is that the performance is well received. The SoC installed in the high-end terminal 'OnePlus 10 Pro' was a Snapdragon 8 Gen1 chip, but the 'OnePlus 10T' is equipped with a newer Snapdragon 8+ Gen1 chip, and as a terminal 'high speed of operation' It is clear that we are aiming for One of the attractions is the 16GB RAM option, which is the first for OnePlus.
Also, although it is a small detail, it is a nice point that OnePlus includes a charger while the number of manufacturers that include a charger is decreasing. The maximum charging performance of 150W exceeds the 80W of the OnePlus 10 Pro, and it also has the fastest charging speed of any OnePlus device to date. However, in North America, it is said that it is limited to a maximum of 125W due to the specifications of the charger. It seems that it was a point to become.
Regarding charging, one of the points pointed out as dissatisfaction is that the wireless charging function has been cut to speed up. James Beckham of Android Police, who lives in the UK and does not have a 125W limit, said, ``There is no wireless charging, but wired charging is fast enough, so there is no problem,'' Ben Scone of 9to5Google said. said, 'I was puzzled by the complete non-support for wireless charging.' ``It's hard to find the power cord in the dark,'' said Julian Chokatz of Wired, who uses many wireless chargers.
As for the shooting performance, the functions are reduced compared to the OnePlus 10 Pro. ``Overall, you can take brighter and slightly less sharp photos than the Pixel 6a,'' said Sam Rutherford of Engadget. However, regarding the macro lens, which can be as close as 4 cm to the subject, he said, 'The resolution is low and the focus is not correct, so it is often better to use only the main camera.' Android Police also criticized, ``It's just garbage to fill the spec sheet.
Also, a disappointing point is the deletion of the alert slider (physical button) that was a feature of OnePlus terminals. Android Police said, ``It makes sense to remove it, but it was one of the unique parts, so it's very disappointing,'' Engadget expressed a similar opinion. 9to5Google also said, ``The alert slider, which was an iconic part of OnePlus, has been removed.The function is not completely gone, but you can definitely feel that its presence has been lost.The additional antenna is worth it. At the moment, I don't think it was a trade-up (exchange to a higher rank),' he said.
In addition, the dustproof and waterproof performance of 'IP54' (protection from dust + no harmful effects from splashing water from any direction) was also a low evaluation point. Ars Technica's Ron Amadeo said, 'One of the painful cost savings is water resistance. IP54 rating means you can get splashed with water, but you can't use it in water, and you can't wash it in the sink. Change something. If possible, it should be the general IP68 standard,” he commented. Wired says, 'It protects you from the rain, but you can't get in the pool. Even the Google Pixel 6a has a good water resistance rating, so it's ridiculous that this expensive device can't match it.' pointed out the lack of performance.
The price of $ 649 (about 87,000 yen) is cheaper than the OnePlus 10 Pro, so it was well received by reviewers who saw it as a derivative of a high-end machine. 9to5Google prefaces that it is a delicate position that 'it lacks functions to be called a flagship, and it is expensive to compete with the midrange'. 10,000 yen), so I evaluated it as suitable for niche demand.
Related Posts:
in Hardware, Posted by logc_nt