Sep 13, 2021 15:00:00

'Livelihood protection decision database' that summarizes the unjustified judgment of the government regarding livelihood protection

During live life a lot of people painful by the pandemic of the new coronavirus, life protection filings in 2020 is the increase since the collapse of Lehman Brothers

shows such as, ' the last of the safety net is increasing year by year the importance of the welfare system, which is also referred to as' I am. However, it is also true that some of the decisions made by the welfare office for welfare applicants and recipients are too strict or violate the Public Assistance Act. If you use the 'living protection decision database ' that collects the results of such trials and examination requests related to living protection, it is possible to see cases where the unjust judgment made by the welfare office was overturned, so I will immediately look at the database. I looked it up.

Livelihood protection decision database
http://seihodb.jp/

When you access the above URL, it looks like this. To search for cases, click Judgment Search.

The welfare decision database contains a total of 802 decisions at the time of writing the article. Click Download to view.

The decision is in PDF file format. For example, in the following case, 'a welfare recipient who has been robbed of a wallet containing welfare expenses has asked for re-payment.' The Disposal Agency, that is, the welfare office in Nakagyo Ward, Kyoto City, decided that 'it will not be repaid because of carelessness such as carrying most of the welfare expenses', but received a request for examination dissatisfied with this. The Examining Agency, that is, Kyoto Prefecture, pointed out that the above-mentioned disposition was 'illegal or unjust', canceled it, and decided to reissue it.

The welfare decision database has a search function that narrows down the cases according to what kind of issue became a problem. To use it, check the items you want to narrow down and click 'Search'. Then, 16 approval documents with temporary assistance as an issue were displayed, so I will click 'Download' of one of them.

In this case, the welfare office in Suita City, Osaka Prefecture said, 'Within a 5-minute walk,' the welfare office in Suita City, Osaka Prefecture, told the examiner who requested the payment of furniture and fixtures because he needed a washing machine and refrigerator, that is, the welfare recipient. The application is rejected because 'you can buy food for the day at the supermarket' and 'you can wash at the coin laundry within a 1-minute walk'.

On the other hand, Osaka Prefecture has canceled the decision of non-payment because the investigation is 'insufficient'. At the same time, we also rejected the request for payment of furniture and fixtures. In other words, it does not decide whether to pay for furniture and fixtures, but instructs the welfare office to re-investigate. In this way, using the welfare decision database, we can see cases where the higher administrative agency overturned the decisions made by the welfare office.

The Administrative Appeal Act stipulates that 'a person who is dissatisfied with the disposition of an administrative agency (...) can file a request for examination.' You can find out how to request an examination by reading the following page of the welfare decision database.

Examination request, trial method

http://seihodb.jp/frontend.php/shinsaseikyuhouhou