It turns out that Photoshop processing is twice faster for Ryusen basebrew PC of 170,000 yen than 580,000 yen Mac Pro

While it is cheaper than Intel's high-end CPU,Benchmark numbers are bigger than IntelIt is enthusiasticly accepted by the high cost performance etc.AMD RyzenWhen I made Photoshop processing on my own $ 1600 PC (about 170,000 yen), it was about 2 times faster than the Mac Pro of $ 5,200 (about 580,000 yen) with a price difference of more than three times The verification result that the processing is completed is known.

$ 1,600 Ryzen based PC has double the performance in Photoshop than a $ 5, 200 Mac Pro. - DIY Photography
http://www.diyphotography.net/1600-ryzen-based-pc-double-performance-photoshop-5200-mac-pro/

The result shows that the YouTube channel "Tech GuyWhat was announced. A movie that compares Mac Pro with 8 core / 3.0 GHz processor and homebrew Windows machine equipped with 8 cores / 3.0 GHz Ryzen 7 1700 is also released.

In Photoshop: 8-Core MacPro vs AMD Ryzen 1700 PC - YouTube


The Mac Pro used for verification is an 8 core / 3.0 GHz processor, a 64 GB DDR 3 ECC memory, and a specification that the AMD FirePro D700 graphic processor is dual-loaded in a graphic processor.


On the other hand, the Ryzen machine is based on Ryzen 7 1700 which is also 8 core / 3.0 GHz, 16 GB memory and "NVIDIA GTX 1080" as a graphic processor are installed.


The price of a Mac Pro is about 5,200 dollars (about 580,000 yen) without tax, about 5,660 dollars (about 620,000 yen) if it is tax-added, it is a truly professional price. One Ryzen machine has about 1530 dollars (about 170,000 yen) and there is a difference of muddy.


The benchmark used for comparison is "Free Radial Blur filter test" published on Keith Simonian's website. It is a content that radial blur is applied to a picture of 4500 × 3000 pixels, and the specification of the machine greatly influences the result.

Improved Photoshop Benchmark CPU speed test for both Mac & PC Free Radial Blur filter test |


First, test the Mac Pro with graphics accelerator. Result is……


It was 15.0 seconds.


Next, test with no graphics accelerator. Then the result is 14.9 seconds, which is within the error range from the previous one. In other words, because no graphics processor is used for this process, you can see that CPU speed can be compared purely.


A similar benchmark is executed on the Ryzen machine. Then the result ......


It's amazing time of 8.8 seconds. You can see that processing was done at about half the speed of a Mac Pro that was more than three times farther away. By the way, even if you switch the presence / absence of graphic accelerator, the result was still that it was together.


In addition, this time we verified it by overclocking the clock frequency to 3.5 GHz.


The result was shortened to 7.7 seconds. Literally, processing was completed at half the speed of Mac Pro.