How to guide you to improve the quality of discussion by making the net discussion constructive

While online bulletin boards may provide very useful information, discussions are often conflicting with irrational abuses. In such a case it is necessary to be an appropriate diversion by bulletin boards and thread managers, but with human strength there is naturally a limit. Considering what kind of mechanism is effective to incorporate the discussion on the online bulletin board to make it constructive and useful is considered.

Crowdsourcing moderation without sacrificing quality - The sideways view
https://sideways-view.com/2016/12/02/crowdsourcing-moderation-without-sacrificing-quality/

Postdoctoral studies computer theory at the University of California, BerkeleyPaul CristianoThinks that the hot debate that is exchanged on the online bulletin board is the best stage and the opportunity to activate the discussion but at the same time most of the discussions fall into a chaotic situation full of writings such as abusive It is regrettable that I will be. So, I thought how discussions could maintain constructive and high quality.

First of all, as a premise, Mr. Cristiano points out the necessity of a "manager" of a thread that leads the discussion well. It is thought that a useful discussion will be realized for those who take part in the discussion by allowing administrators to successfully guide the flow of the discussion and get out of the state of "going over to the fun boat and getting up to the fun" It is.


Of course, if there is infinite time, the custodian should look through all the posts, "Which opinion should stand out?" "Which posts are visible and what posts should be clicked on Should I not state it? ", But this is impossible. Therefore, Mr. Cristiano suggests the following system as an alternative.

1:Provision of "tool that can hide comments" or "tool that makes comments stand out or not noticeable" for administrators
2:Introduction of tools that allow non-administrator users to evaluate "interesting, correct, beneficial, harmful" for 'tools that can evaluate comments' or comments
3:Let administrators get opinions from users such as "How do you think about a series of postings? Hide, raise up, lower down, leave alone" etc.
Four:Introduction of a machine learning tool for predicting "How will a manager respond to questions?"
Five:Use of a model that predicts "what kind of action would be taken if an administrator would trigger?" Rather than actually relying on the behavior of the manager

With these five systems, the manager will point out that the free time will increase, Mr. Cristiano points out. And the administrator who can afford the time thinks that it is possible to maintain the quality of the discussion by doing the following.

1:The administrator introduces two policies "aggressive" and "passive" to manage the discussion, making it possible for the user viewing the bulletin board to select which mode to view in the mode
2:Make administrators manage wide fields
3:Make the same discussion managed by multiple administrators and make it possible for viewers to select administrators
Four:For example, like peer review of science and technology papers, let the administrator carefully verify the truth and credibility of comments