The number of users of the Chinese model 'GLM-5.2' API on OpenRouter has surged; what are AI users using it for?

'
GLM 5.2 - API Pricing & Benchmarks | OpenRouter
https://openrouter.ai/z-ai/glm-5.2#benchmarks
GLM 5.2 vs DeepSeek V4: share of tokens on OpenRouter
— OpenRouter (@OpenRouter) June 23, 2026
GLM 5.2 has had a very fast uptake relative to most open-weight launches pic.twitter.com/C40EMaDEPW
Z.ai is a company known for developing AI models called the GLM series. The GLM series is characterized by its development as an open model, with the models being made publicly available. When the services for 'Claude Fable 5' and 'Claude Mythos 5' were discontinued on June 13, 2026, Z.ai announced the release of GLM-5.2, which was officially released on June 17, 2026. GLM-5.2 has achieved scores that surpass Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.5 in multiple benchmark tests, and in the Design Arena coding performance test conducted by human blind testing, it surpassed Claude Fabe 5 to claim the top spot in the world.
GLM-5.2, a Chinese model surpassing Claude Opus 4.7, has been officially announced. It has even outperformed Claude Fable 5 in some tests and is available for download as an open model - GIGAZINE

GLM-5.2 is available via API, and OpenRouter, which handles APIs from various AI companies, also provides a GLM-5.2 API. The image below shows the daily share of API models used on OpenRouter, with white representing Z.ai's share and blue representing DeepSeek's share. Z.ai's share has increased sharply since June 16, 2026 (local time), when GLM-5.2 was released.

OpenRouter offers several Z.ai models, but the GLM-5.2 reportedly accounts for 75% of the market share. OpenRouter commented that 'the GLM-5.2 is gaining popularity much faster than most other open models.'

Looking at the OpenRouter

The official X account for the AI coding agent Cline also highly praised GLM-5.2, reporting that 'when we had GLM-5.2 and Claude Opus 4.8 fix existing bugs in Cline, GLM-5.2 was superior in terms of cost and quality,' 'GLM-5.2 consumed twice as many tokens as Claude Opus 4.8, but at half the cost,' and 'GLM-5.2 verified whether the task was compilable before completion, while Claude Opus 4.8 did not verify and left errors.'
We've kept hearing how GLM-5.2 beats Opus 4.8, and are skeptical of benchmarks - so we tested them on a real bug from the Cline repo. While both models fixed the issue, GLM was the winner in terms of cost and code quality:
— Cline (@cline) June 22, 2026
- GLM used twice as many tokens (GLM 1.1m vs Opus 660K)… pic.twitter.com/0MQGjbsavp
Related Posts:
in AI, Posted by log1o_hf






