"Bitcoin (bit coin)" What is the division problem? You can see well what you understand how what happens

ByDennis M 2

"Bitcoin (bit coin)" which is a representative of the virtual currency isLimit of performanceIt is about to reach,Clogged moneyThere are several problems such as. In order to solve such a problem, proposals to improve the performance of the bit coin in the Bitcoin community has multiple appeared.

Bit coin split question continuation report! From UAHF to SegWit 2 x. What is SegWit 2x? Attention on July 21! - Blog to learn from scratch because I do not want to worry with money
http://moneygamexx.hatenadiary.com/entry/2017/07/13/193013

The idea for improving bit coin is mainly for users with bit coinminorIt is a problem because the suggested recommendations differ between.

The proposal by the bit coin user side is to increase the amount of data that can be written to the block by enabling the function of "Segwit (BIP 141)" in the bit coin so farUASF(User activated soft fork) "(soft fork). For the minor side against, replace it with a block with a larger capacity "UAHF(User activated hard fork) "(hard fork) is supported and it is a stance not to leave to divide into the side which does not adopt it.

After that, as a new plan following UASF · UAHF "Segwit 2x(SegWit 2 MB) "will appear. This is a proposal proposed by Degital Currency Group CEO Barry Silvato, which makes Segwit 2 MB larger than UASF and is compatible with user's proposal. This Segwit 2x has supported the major bit coin related companies in China such as OKCoin, BTCC, Huobi which is a major exchange in China and Bixin which is involved in the development of bit coins, and some of the UAHF side is also approved doing. The Segwit 2 × draft, if agreement is obtained from 80% of all bit coin usersTo be executedThat time has come and that deadline is coming soon.

ByAntana

Because of the twists and turns, it is quite confusing how the bit coin will split if it breaks. 0 0 payrence 0 0 payrence 0 payrence 0 payrence 0 payrence 0 0 payrence 0 payrence 0 0 payrence 0 payrence 0 0 payrence 0 payrence 0 0 payrence 0 payrence 0 0 payrence 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 payrence 0 payrence 0 0 0 0 payrence 0

What Could Happen to Bitcoin? A Visual Guide to Scaling Outcomes - CoinDesk
http://www.coindesk.com/happen-bitcoin-visual-guide-scaling-outcomes/


This is a big picture of the figure briefly describing what will happen to bit coins in the future. "BIP 91" written under "Segwit 2 x" is a bit coinDeployment methodAnd "BIP 148" under "UASF" has the same meaning.


The first branch point to visit is this. Whether "Segwit 2 x" draft will be adopted will be executed if the supporter exceeds 80%.


Even if support of 80% or more is obtained, there are two possibilities, and if 100% support is obtained after that, the block size will be doubled to 2 MB as proposed by "Segwit 2 x". However, if 100% of support is not obtained, it will split into the side that executes the "Segwit 2 x" proposal and the side which does not.


On the contrary, Segwit will be activated within 2017 if supporters of the "Segwit 2 x" proposal do not exceed 80%. When the draft "UASF" on the user side is executed and the support rate exceeds 50%, the soft fork which Segwit is activated will be successful after 2017, but if the support rate is 50% or less, the bit coin It splits,ABC clientAnd a conventional client.


And you can see the support rate of "Segwit 2 x" draft and "UASF" draft below site. Orange's "BIP 91 (74.9%)" is a layer that supports the "Segwit 2 x" proposal, yellow green "SW (18.1%)" is a Segwit backing layer, so the data size is adopted to expand the block size to 2 MB It seems that the probability is high. However, since these are data that was aggregated based on the client's signals, these are suggestions of the possibility of a fake signal, and it seems that there is still a situation where bit coins are unlikely to happen is.

Bitcoin Blockchain statistics - XBT.eu