December 21, 2012 Mayan calendar announces a movie that NASA explained about the destruction of the earth
"According to the Mayan calendar, the earth will be destroyed on December 21, 2012"Or"The planet collides with the earth and the earth will perish"Rumors that are spreading in the world, but NASA conducted explanations on YouTube that there is no such worry at all.
ScienceCasts: Why the World Did not End Yesterday - YouTube
"If we were able to see this image on December 22, 2012, the world was not destroyed yesterday," the narrator says.
Maya civilizationHas formed a large city in the southeastern part of Mexico and it seems that the population density was as low as the current Los Angeles.
Many cultures such as astronomy and languages were developed, but the remarkable thing is the sense of their excellent time.
Maya's calendar ended on December 21, 2012, which means that it means the end of the world, but in reality this means that a new cycle on Maya's calendar began It seems to be there.
Just as the car's odometer goes around, it is the same as counting from the beginning.
In addition, when archeologists survey thousands of Mayan civilization runes, flat plates, and Tateishi, it seems that we could not admit anything to foretold the end of the world anywhere.
We also deny the possibility that meteorites and planets will collide with the Earth.
If you really are trying to collide with the Earth, it is very bright that anyone can see with the naked eye, but we can not confirm such things at the moment.
Furthermore, it is said that the destruction of the earth by the solar storm is impossible. The sun is burning long before the Maya civilization has occurred, but until now the crisis has never been such a crisis.
The solar activity has a cycle every 11 years, but this cycle is the weakest cycle in the past 50 years and there is no problem.
So on December 21, 2012, there seems to be no special thing to happen, so it seems to be relieved and good. In addition,Pole shiftNASA's view of various risks such as possibility ofHereBecause it is described in, it seems to be good if you worry carefully.