A thief repelling system that makes a dog bark from a speaker when a security camera reacts



It seems that thieves dislike 'security cameras' and 'dog barks', and the person who created a warning system that combines these and 'plays dog barks from the speaker if there is a reaction to the security camera' is the source code Is open to the public.

Fake Dog for Home Security | t0.vc

https://t0.vc/7/



The system was built by Tanner, who works in the automation field. The system consists of an inexpensive single board computer, the Raspberry Pi, speakers, and a camera.

Mr. Tanner has one speaker and one security camera set on the front and back door of the house, and when the security camera on the front responds, the dog barks first from the speaker on the back door, and then the dog from the front speaker. The cry of. When the security camera on the back door responds, on the contrary, the dog barks flow from the front speaker to the back door speaker. This is a simulation of how the dog moves toward the entrance where there was a reaction.

The source code is published on Gitea.

tanner / woof --woof --Gitea: Git with a cup of tea
https://git.tannercollin.com/tanner/woof

According to The Guardian, a large British letter, insurance company Co-op Insurance surveyed 12 former thieves, and more than half said that 'thieves are wandering inconspicuously looking for a place to break in.' He mentioned 'surveillance camera,' 'barking dog,' 'sturdy door,' 'television sound,' and 'resin sash window' as effective deterrents against house intrusion and car theft. Tanner's mechanism can be said to be a combination of this 1st and 2nd place.

Former burglars say barking dogs and CCTV are best deterrent | Insurance industry | The Guardian
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/aug/18/former-burglars-barking-dogs-cctv-best-deterrent

The problem with the system is that security cameras can falsely detect car lights and small animals passing by, but Tanner said, 'There are thieves, but there are no thieves, rather than not. It is better to make a false positive. '

in Security, Posted by logc_nt