Creativity is more important than planned practice of 10,000 hours


ByHandy Andy Pandy

"Law of 10,000 hours" that anyone can acquire first-class skills through 10,000 hours of sincere exerciseWas announced in 1993 and it became a big topic, but the author Anders ErikssonA bookIt is chess and sports that the law of 10,000 hours works, it says that it does not apply to many of the contemporary occupations such as competitive gardening and hobbies and teachers, engineers and consultants. "Creativity" is different from "technology obtained by training", and why it is important to become creative is a science information siteScientific AmericanIt is summarized in 12 items.

Creativity Is Much More Than 10,000 Hours of Deliberate Practice - Scientific American Blog Network
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/beautiful-minds/creativity-is-much-more-than-10-000-hours-of-deliberate-practice/

◆ 01: Creativity is blind

BySophia Louise

For many creators, "I can accept my ideas and products" can not be predicted. Also, even though the idea is excellent, timing is bad and people are not ready to accept. Creativity is blind and can not be predicted until ideas and products actually see the eyes, so the idea of ​​"practice" or "training" predicting results in advance is incompatible with creativity.

◆ 02: Many of the creative people are blurred

ByDom W

If the characteristics of "expert" are consistent and certainty, the characteristics of creativity are in "start from failure" "trial and error". Creators who produce great works only have great work. Shakespeare said "HamletAlthough it produced a masterpiece that remains in posterity, such as "Troilus and CresidaThere should be few people who know about. If practice increases creativity, you should be able to produce excellent work every time, but it is not always true. Therefore, the best masterpiece of a creative person is not the late stage of life, but often appears around the middle.

◆ 03: Creator does not get useful feedback

ByValery Kenski

Feedback is often easy to obtain and effective in organized fields such as examination and acquisition of specific technologies, but it is rare that useful feedback is obtained in the field of creativity. Only pure praise and refusal are waiting for the author who sent the work. Sometimes criticisms are given to the work, but often it includes jealousy, stupidity and harshness of the critic, so it is difficult for creators to distinguish "what really useful feedback" It is.

◆ 04: "10 years rule" is not a rule

ByAngelia Sims

Mr. Ericsson claimed that the decade rule "It will take at least 10 years to reach world-class achievement", but Mr. Ericsson did not provide the basis statements in the original thesis, then another researcher We will investigate the period until first-class players in the field of music, sports etc. acquire skills. In the survey that a researcher carried out "how long it took the composer to produce a famous work" resulted in "average 10 years", the important thing is that this result is " Average value ". In fact there were many people who had less than 10 years to produce famous works, while some people took more than 30 years. Creativity is not something that can be predicted as "when it will be demonstrated", it is what it will be "demonstrated when it is demonstrated."

◆ 05: Talent is related to creativity

ByConstanza Mella

In a study that investigated the time until 120 composers acquire skills, it is much shorter than the time until the average composer learns technology · There are people who can acquire skills with less practice Then it was shown. It may be something I do not want to admit too much, but talent seems to be very important for creativity.

◆ 06: Personality is also relevant

ByFrank Monnerjahn

Past research shows that creative people are less cooperative, independent of tradition, self-reliant, do not fear experience, have a strong ego, take risks, and even have a psychopathological tendency . Of course, other peculiar elements are becoming more important, but these qualities tell the principal to move himself in a different direction from practice and training. In order to master medicine I need a higher IQ than to acquire visual art, but in the creative field there is a person's characteristic that works stronger than IQ.

◆ 07: Genes are also relevant

ByClaraDon

Of course, this does not mean that "the gene decides the behavior of the person himself", "that the gene affects his / her behavior". Mr. Ericsson has said that training is important rather than "born with" to master expertise, but attitudes towards practice and training, and human preference are also genetic factors . Professor of psychology Professor Dean Simonton assumed that the nature of the individual affecting creativity is a genetic factor and that the impact of genetic factors on performance is one quarter to one third of the total It is explained that it is between. Genes are related to creativity, but this does not mean that environmental factors are not important.

◆ 08: Environmental factors are more important than genetic factors

ByFelipe Fernandes

Be an initial geneticistFrancis GoltonMany researchers have discovered environmental factors that create genius from the time they announced the finding that the great scientist is often the eldest son to the present. One example is the socio-economic, socio-cultural, political origins and economic backgrounds. It is known that creativity is influenced by environmental factors rather than genetic factors, and the most important thing is whether there were people who modeled at an early age.

◆ 09: The interests of creative people are diverse

ByThomas Hawk

Mastering techniques to repeat training and practice focuses on one area, while creative people are interested in a wide range of subjects. However, some people who acquired expert skills also have creative people who are interested in a wide field. Simonton conducted a survey of 59 composers who provided music to 911 operas. If creativity is nurtured by training, an excellent composer should be a person who is making only songs of a specific genre, but in reality the opposite is true. It turned out that successful composers were making songs of various genres.

As mentioned above, the example where cross-training celebrate creativity is more than just music. Galileo Galilei is familiar with music, art and literature, and it is known that many historic prominent scientists were involved in enterprises and were engaged in a variety of loosely related projects.

◆ 10: Too much expertise kills creativity

ByNatesh Ramasamy

When expressing the relation between knowledge and creativity as a linear function, it becomes reverse U shape. Moderate knowledge has a positive effect on creativity, but too much knowledge impairs flexibility. For example, in the field of writing things, it seems that the students who attended the school who learn formats are less likely to write creative writing.

◆ 11: Outsiders have an advantage for creativity

ByThierry ehrmann

Many revolutionary people who existed in the past were outsiders in that field. Dissatisfied with the current situation in a specific field, once distance from the main stream once worked favorably for creativity. A well-known person in history is "not able to make creative ideas despite an outsider" but "It was an outsider, so it was the creative idea that I could have made." For example, an American composerIrving BerlinMr. and a film directorAnne LeeMr., First Secretary of State in the United StatesMadeleine AlbrightHe did not practice on already existing roads, but because he was an outsider, he opened a new path himself.

◆ 12: Sometimes creative people need to open the way for "people to master in training"

ByNedasta

Creative people are not good at solving problems, but I am good at finding problems. The discovery of Galileo Galilei is one of the famous examples showing that, he repeatedly tried and created a new tool to observe the night sky and revolutionized astronomy. Galilei did not build training and practice, it was a very creative person who brought discovery where there is no existing research at all. Experts at the time denied the idea of ​​Galilei, but at that time Galileo'sChiaroscuroBy the technique, it is said that Galilei was able to explain that many experts are wrong in finding a picture. People who acquire specialized skills through training and practice tend to "solve" problems in a single field, so creative people who "find out" problems with a multifaceted view become important .

in Note, Posted by darkhorse_log